Compare Volvo XC60 facelift vs Volvo XC90 vs Peugeot 5008 II

Volvo XC60 (Y20) facelift Crossover (2013-2017)

Peugeot 5008 II (T87) Crossover (2016-2020)

Volvo Cars | Cars

Peugeot | Cars

Variants

D3 136PS

D3 136PS AT

D3 150PS

D3 150PS AT

D4 163PS

D4 163PS AT

D4 163PS AWD

D4 163PS AWD AT

D4 181PS AWD

D4 181PS AWD AT

D4 190PS AWD

D4 190PS AWD AT

D4 Bi-Turbo 181PS

D4 Bi-Turbo 181PS AT

D4 Bi-Turbo 190PS

D4 Bi-Turbo 190PS Automatic

D5 Bi-Turbo 215PS AWD

D5 Bi-Turbo 215PS AWD AT

D5 Bi-Turbo 220PS AWD

D5 Bi-Turbo 220PS AWD AT

T5 AT

T5 AWD AT

T6 AT

T6 AWD AT

D3 AT

D3 AWD AT

2.5T AWD

2.5T AWD AT

T6 AWD

3.2 AWD

1.2 130

1.2 130 AT

1.2 130 Euro6d

1.2 130 Euro6d AT

1.5 HDi 130 Euro6d

1.6 180 AT

1.6 HDi 100

1.6 HDi 120

1.6 HDi 120 AT

1.6 THP 165 AT

2.0 HDi 150

2.0 HDi 177 AT

2.0 HDi 180 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

780 L / 27.5 cu-ft ~ 1940 L / 68.5 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

70.0 L / 18.5 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Offroad | Approach Angle

19.0 deg

Offroad | Departure Angle

28.0 deg

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Semi-independent, coil spring

Turning Circle

12.7 m / 41.7 ft

11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style

5-door Crossover

5-door SUV

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

230 mm / 9.1 in

236 mm / 9.3 in

Size | Height

1646 mm / 64.8 in

Size | Length

4641 mm / 182.7 in

Size | Width

1844 mm / 72.6 in | 2098 mm / 82.6 in (mirror unfolded) | 1906 mm / 75.0 in (mirror folded)

Track Width | Front

1593.0 mm / 62.7 in

Track Width | Rear

1586.0 mm / 62.4 in

Wheelbase

2774 mm / 109.2 in

2840 mm / 111.8 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Reviews

Neofiliac score

42%

38%

24%

Pros

Improved styling
Interesting I5 and I6 engines
Improved fit and finish
New 8-speed auto gearbox

High cargo capacity
Good exterior styling

Beautiful interior
Good towing capacity
Decent exterior design

Cons

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Horrible 0-100kph time
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Pretends to be "SUV"

Bad 0-100kph time
No powerful engine options
Only available with small engines
No independent rear suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.