HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo XC60 vs Chevrolet Captiva vs Volvo V40 Cross Country

Variants
2.4D
2.4D AWD
2.4D AWD AT
3.2 238PS AWD
3.2 243PS AWD
D3 AT
D3 AWD
D3 AWD AT
D5 185PS AWD
D5 185PS AWD AT
D5 205PS AWD
D5 205PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AWD
DRIVe
T5 240
T6 285PS AWD
T6 285PS AWD AT
T6 304PS AWD
2.0 VCDi 127
2.0 VCDi 127 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD
2.0 VCDi 150 AWD AT
2.2 VCDi 163
2.2 VCDi 163 AT
2.2 VCDi 163 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AT
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD
2.2 VCDi 184 AWD AT
2.4
2.4 AWD
2.4 AWD AT
2.4 Ecotec 167
2.4 Ecotec 167 AT
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD
2.4 Ecotec 167 AWD AT
3.0 AWD AT
3.2 AWD AT
Sport 2.4 AT
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 177PS
D4 177PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T4
T4 180PS AT
T4 180PS AWD AT
T4 AT
T5 213PS AT
T5 213PS AWD AT
T5 245PS AWD AT
T5 254PS AT
T5 254PS AWD AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5 / 7
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
18.2 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
22.7 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Independent, spring
Tire Size
235/65 R17, 235/60 R18

Construction

Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
5-door Crossover

Dimensions

Size | Height
1713 mm / 67.4 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4370 mm / 172.0 in
Size | Width
1857 mm / 73.1 in
Track Width | Front
1632.0 mm / 64.3 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2646 mm / 104.2 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
284 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.38

Powertrain

Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Reviews

Neofiliac score
33%
45%
21%
Pros
  • Interesting I5 and I6 engines
  • OK-looking for a crossover
  • Good fit and finish
  • Reasonable drivetrain reliability
  • Good towing capacity
  • Very low official fuel consumption
  • Interesting I5 engine still available
  • Reasonably high reliability
  • Decent fit and finish
Cons
  • MacPherson strut front suspensions
  • Very ugly
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • High 0.38 drag coefficient
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Basic suspension setup
  • Low cargo capacity
  • Can't go offroad
  • Rather uglified

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.