Compare Chevrolet Traverse vs Chevrolet Equinox 3
Variants
281 AWD
281 FWD
288 AWD
288 FWD
1.5
1.5 AWD
1.5
1.6d
1.6d AWD
2.0
2.0 AWD
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
11.2 L / 11.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
83.3 L / 22.0 gal
Passengers
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs, 325 mm
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs, 331 mm
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/70 R17, 255/65 R18, 255/55 R20
Turning Circle
12.3 m / 40.3 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Crossover
5-door SUV
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
183 mm / 7.2 in
Wheel Size
7J x 17, 7.5J x 18, 8J x 20
Wheelbase
2725 mm / 107.3 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
2358 kg / 5199 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic 6T75
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2017
Reviews
Neofiliac score
21%
19%
Pros
- High cargo capacity
- Rather reliable powertrain
- Cheap to purchase
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Very bland, unfinished styling
- Ugly
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.