Compare Volvo V70 III vs Volvo V70 III facelift vs Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift

Variants
2.0
2.0D
2.0F Ethanol
2.0F Ethanol AT
2.0T
2.0T AT
2.4D 163PS
2.4D 163PS AT
2.4D 175PS
2.4D 175PS AT
2.5FT 200PS
2.5FT 200PS AT
2.5FT 231PS
2.5FT 231PS AT
2.5T 200PS
2.5T 200PS AT
2.5T 231PS
2.5T 231PS AT
3.2 238PS AT
3.2 238PS AWD AT
3.2 243PS AT
3.2 243PS AWD AT
D3
D3 AT
D5 185PS
D5 185PS AT
D5 185PS AWD
D5 185PS AWD AT
D5 205PS
D5 205PS AT
D5 205PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
DRIVe
T4
T4 AT
T4F Ethanol
T4F Ethanol AT
T5
T5 AT
T6 285PS AWD AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
D2
D2 AT
D3
D3 AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AT
D4 163PS AWD AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 181PS AWD AT
D5
D5 AT
D5 AWD AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 AWD AT
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
575 L / 20.3 cu-ft
555 L / 19.6 cu-ft ~ 1580 L / 55.8 cu-ft
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
151 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1547 mm / 60.9 in
1547 mm / 60.9 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4823 mm / 189.9 in
4814 mm / 189.5 in
4595 mm / 180.9 in
Size | Width
1907 mm / 75.1 in
1760 mm / 69.3 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
1586.0 mm / 62.4 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2816 mm / 110.9 in
2816 mm / 110.9 in
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
38.0 m / 124.6 ft

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 6 W
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
54%
60%
30%
Pros
  • Interesting new inline-6 engines
  • Still many good I5s to choose from
  • Elegant and clean styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Good engine lineup remained available
  • Cleaner, more imposing design
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.