HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Volvo V90 vs Volvo V60 II vs Mercedes C-Class Estate S206

Variants
D3
D3 Euro6d
D3 AT
D3 Euro6d AT
D3 AWD AT
D3 Euro6d AWD AT
D4 Euro6d
D4
D4 AT
D4 Euro6d AT
D4 AWD AT
D4 Euro6d AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
T4 AT
T4 Euro6d AT
T5 250PS AT
T5 250PS Euro6d AT
T5 254PS AT
T6 310PS AWD AT
T6 Euro6d 310PS AWD AT
T6 320PS AWD AT
T8 391PS AWD Hybrid
T8 407PS AWD Hybrid
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
C 200 4MATIC AT
C 200 AT
C 220d 4MATIC AT
C 220d AT
C 300d AT
C 300e AT
C 300 4MATIC AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in

Construction

Battery | Capacity
25.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
153 mm / 6.0 in
97 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Height
1475 mm / 58.1 in
Size | Length
4936 mm / 194.3 in
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4751 mm / 187.0 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2865 mm / 112.8 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
0.29
0.27
Electric Range
95.0 km / 59.0 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
9
Transmission | Type
Automatic 9G-TRONIC

Production

Availability
2021

Reviews

Neofiliac score
67%
62%
67%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Exceptionally elegant
  • Good styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low fuel consumption
  • Great styling
  • Good suspension setup
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Only available with small engines
  • Only available with small engines

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.