Compare Volvo V90 vs Peugeot 407 SW vs Peugeot 308 SW III
Variants
D3
D3 Euro6d
D3 AT
D3 Euro6d AT
D3 AWD AT
D3 Euro6d AWD AT
D4 Euro6d
D4
D4 AT
D4 Euro6d AT
D4 AWD AT
D4 Euro6d AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
D5 AWD AT
T4 AT
T4 Euro6d AT
T5 250PS AT
T5 250PS Euro6d AT
T5 254PS AT
T6 310PS AWD AT
T6 Euro6d 310PS AWD AT
T6 320PS AWD AT
T8 391PS AWD Hybrid
T8 407PS AWD Hybrid
1.6 HDi
1.8
2.0 HDi
2.0
2.0 AT
2.2 HDi
2.2
2.2 AT
3.0
1.2 PureTech 110
1.2 PureTech 130
1.2 PureTech 130 AT
1.5 BlueHDi 130
1.5 BlueHDi 130 Hp) EAT8
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 180
1.6 PureTech Hybrid 225
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
12.0 m / 39.4 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
153 mm / 6.0 in
Size | Height
1475 mm / 58.1 in
1486 mm / 58.5 in
1444 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4936 mm / 194.3 in
4763 mm / 187.5 in
4636 mm / 182.5 in
Size | Width
1811 mm / 71.3 in
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2062 mm / 81.2 in (mirror unfolded) | 1860 mm / 73.2 in (mirror folded)
Track Width | Front
1554.0 mm / 61.2 in
1559.0 mm / 61.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1510.0 mm / 59.4 in
Wheelbase
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
2732 mm / 107.6 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
CO2 Emission
165 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30 ~ 0.33
0.277
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1900 kg / 4189 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1450 kg / 3197 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Production
Availability
2004 ~ 2010
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
67%
23%
31%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Exceptionally elegant
- Easy to DIY
- Parts are cheap
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Improved styling
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Poor suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.