Compare Volkswagen Golf 6 Variant vs Opel Insignia A Sports Tourer facelift vs Chevrolet HHR

Variants
1.2 TSI 105PS
1.2 TSI 105PS DSG
1.2 TSI 85PS
1.2 TSI BMT 105PS
1.4
1.4 TSI 122PS
1.4 TSI 122PS DSG
1.4 TSI 160PS
1.4 TSI 160PS DSG
1.6
1.6 TDI 105PS
1.6 TDI 105PS 4MOTION
1.6 TDI 105PS DSG
1.6 TDI BMT 105PS
1.6 TDI BMT 105PS DSG
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS DSG
1.4 T
1.4 T LPG 140PS
1.6 T
1.6 T AT
1.6 CDTI 120PS
1.6 CDTI 136PS
1.6 CDTI 136PS AT
1.8
2.0 T AWD AT
2.0 T AWD
2.0 CDTI 110PS
2.0 CDTI 120PS
2.0 CDTI 130PS
2.0 CDTI 130PS AT
2.0 CDTI 140PS
2.0 CDTI 163PS AWD AT
2.0 CDTI 163PS AWD
2.0 CDTI 163PS AT
2.0 CDTI 163PS
2.0 CDTI 170PS
2.0 CDTI 170PS AT
2.0 CDTI 170PS AWD
2.0 CDTI 170PS AWD AT
2.0 CDTI 195PS AWD AT
2.0 CDTI 195PS AT
2.0 CDTI 195PS
OPC 2.8 T AWD
OPC 2.8 T AWD AT
OPC 2.8 T AWD
2.2
2.2 AT
2.4
2.4 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
505 L / 17.8 cu-ft ~ 1495 L / 52.8 cu-ft
540 L / 19.1 cu-ft ~ 1530 L / 54.0 cu-ft
638 L / 22.5 cu-ft ~ 1785 L / 63.0 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
49.0 L / 12.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.3 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
11.9 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Tire Size
215/55 R16
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1603 mm / 63.1 in
Size | Length
4475 mm / 176.2 in
Size | Width
1755 mm / 69.1 in
Track Width | Front
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1508.0 mm / 59.4 in
1491.0 mm / 58.7 in
Wheel Size
6.5J X 16
Wheelbase
2737 mm / 107.8 in
2628 mm / 103.5 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2005 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score
33%
53%
1%
Pros
  • Now with independent rear suspensions
  • Very elegant and handsome
  • Good fuel economy ratings
  • Nothing
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Still uses MacPherson struts in the front
  • MacPherson front suspension
  • Not the best handling
  • Exceptionally ugly
  • No powerful engine options
  • No independent suspensions
  • Outdated transmissions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.