Compare Mercedes E-Class Estate S213 vs Volvo V60 II vs Mercedes C-Class Estate S206
Variants
AMG E 43 4MATIC
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 S 4MATIC+
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200 EQ Boost
E 200 EQ Boost 4MATIC
E 200d
E 220d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 250
E 300 EQ Boost
E 300d
E 300de PHEV
E 350d
E 350d 4MATIC
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
D3
D3 AWD
D3 MT
D4
D4 AWD
D4 MT
Polestar
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 TwEn AWD
T8 TwEn AWD
C 200 4MATIC AT
C 200 AT
C 220d 4MATIC AT
C 220d AT
C 300d AT
C 300e AT
C 300 4MATIC AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
640 L / 22.6 cu-ft ~ 1820 L / 64.3 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.9 L / 9.4 qt
12.0 L / 12.7 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.0 L / 6.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.7 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
8.5 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.6 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
25.4 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
97 mm / 3.8 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4751 mm / 187.0 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1820 mm / 71.7 in | 2033 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1609.0 mm / 63.3 in
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheelbase
2939 mm / 115.7 in
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2865 mm / 112.8 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.27
Electric Range
95.0 km / 59.0 mi
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 6d
Euro 6d-ISC-FCM
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
9
Transmission | Type
Automatic 9G-TRONIC
Production
Availability
2021
Reviews
Neofiliac score
87%
62%
67%
Pros
- Multi-link suspensions all-around
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved exterior design
- Superb 9G-Tronic automatic suspension
- Good styling
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Great styling
- Good suspension setup
Cons
- Questionable hot-vee design for the AMG
- Only available with small engines
- Only available with small engines
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.