Compare Toyota Auris 2 Touring Sports facelift vs Volkswagen Passat B5.5 Variant vs Volkswagen Golf 7 Variant

Variants
1.2T CVT
1.2T MT
1.33 Dual VVT-i MT
1.4 D-4D MT
1.6 D-4D MT
1.8 Hybrid
1.8 T
1.8 T AT
1.9 TDI 100PS
1.9 TDI 100PS AT
1.9 TDI 130PS 4MOTION
1.9 TDI 130PS 5MT
1.9 TDI 130PS 6MT
1.9 TDI 130PS AT
2.0
2.3 VR5
2.3 VR5 4MOTION
2.3 VR5 AT
2.5 TDI 4MOTION
2.5 TDI 4MOTION AT
2.5 TDI AT
2.5 TDI V6
2.8 4MOTION
2.8 4MOTION AT
4.0 W8 4MOTION
4.0 W8 4MOTION AT
1.0 TSI BlueMotion
1.0 TSI BlueMotion DSG
1.2 TSI 105PS
1.2 TSI 105PS DSG
1.2 TSI 110PS
1.2 TSI 110PS DSG
1.2 TSI 85PS
1.4 TGI BlueMotion
1.4 TGI BlueMotion DSG
1.4 TSI 122PS
1.4 TSI 122PS DSG
1.4 TSI 125PS
1.4 TSI 125PS DSG
1.4 TSI 140PS
1.4 TSI 140PS DSG
1.4 TSI 150PS
1.4 TSI 150PS DSG
1.6 TDI 105PS
1.6 TDI 105PS 4MOTION
1.6 TDI 105PS DSG
1.6 TDI 110PS
1.6 TDI 110PS 4MOTION
1.6 TDI 110PS BlueMotion
1.6 TDI 110PS DSG
1.6 TDI 90PS
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI 4MOTION
2.0 TDI DSG
GTD
GTD DSG

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
50.0 L / 13.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Station Wagon

Dimensions

Size | Height
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4595 mm / 180.9 in
4682 mm / 184.3 in
Size | Width
1760 mm / 69.3 in
1746 mm / 68.7 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 W
Euro 6
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2015 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
30%
68%
22%
Pros
  • Very low fuel consumption
  • Superb reliability
  • More modern design
  • Superb suspension setup in 4Motion models
  • Wonderful engines, including VR5, VR6, and W8
  • Clean, classic styling
  • No bullshit
  • Down to very low 3.5L/100km fuel consumption
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Poor handling
  • Semi-independent suspension for FWD models
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Somewhat ugly

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.