Compare Toyota Matrix E130 vs Toyota Yaris 4 vs Mazda 2 III
Variants
1.8 124PS AWD
1.8 124PS AWD AT
1.8 132PS
1.8 132PS AT
1.8 183PS
1.0 69 CVT
1.5 120
1.5 120 AWD CVT
1.5 120 CVT
1.5 91 Hybrid
1.5 91 Hybrid E-Four
GR-FOUR
GRMN
1.5 SkyActiv-D
1.5 SkyActiv-G 115
1.5 SkyActiv-G 75
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90
1.5 SkyActiv-G 90 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
617 L / 21.8 cu-ft ~ 1507 L / 53.2 cu-ft
207 L / 7.3 cu-ft
280 L / 9.9 cu-ft ~ 950 L / 33.5 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
44.0 L / 11.6 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion beam
Semi-independent, Torsion beam
Tire Size
205/55 R16
Turning Circle
9.8 m / 32.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
5-door Station Wagon
5-door Hatchback
Platform
TNGA: GA-B
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1540 mm / 60.6 in
1495 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4350 mm / 171.3 in
4060 mm / 159.8 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1695 mm / 66.7 in | 1983 mm / 78.1 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1495.0 mm / 58.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2600 mm / 102.4 in
2570 mm / 101.2 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
5.5 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
5.2 sec
CO2 Emission
186 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.352
0.29
Top Speed
229.0 km/h / 142.3 mph
Towing Capacity
515 kg / 1135 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1100 kg / 2425 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 6 AP
Euro 6
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2002 ~ 2007
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
51%
26%
Pros
- Small turning circle
- Reliable engines
- Low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
- Great styling
- Decent reliability
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Very low fuel consumption
- Small turning circle
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Boring design
- Only available with tiny engines
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with tiny engines
- Semi-independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.