HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Skoda Superb B8 vs Skoda Superb 3 facelift vs Peugeot 508 facelift

Variants
1.4 TSI 125PS
1.4 TSI 150PS 4x4
1.4 TSI 150PS
1.4 TSI 150PS DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150PS
2.0 TDI 150PS 4x4
2.0 TDI 150PS 7DSG
2.0 TDI 190PS
2.0 TDI 190PS 6DSG
2.0 TDI 190PS 6DSG 4x4
2.0 TDI 190PS 7DSG
2.0 TDI 190PS 7DSG 4x4
2.0 TSI 220PS 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 220PS DSG
2.0 TSI 272PS 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 280PS 4x4 DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI 122 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 190 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 190 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 200 DSG
2.0 TSI 190 DSG
2.0 TSI 272 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 280 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 115 AT
e-THP 165
e-THP 165 AT
VTi 120 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0 HDi 160
2.0 HDi 160 AT
HYbrid4
2.2 HDi 204 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
625 L / 22.1 cu-ft ~ 1760 L / 62.2 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.0 deg
13.8 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.2 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
12.2 m / 40.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.0 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
146 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1468 mm / 57.8 in
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4861 mm / 191.4 in
4869 mm / 191.7 in
4830 mm / 190.2 in
Size | Width
1864 mm / 73.4 in | 2031 mm / 80.0 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2817 mm / 110.9 in

Reviews

Neofiliac score
45%
42%
19%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption on paper
  • Bargain way to get a B8 Passat
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.4L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • High cargo capacity
  • Slightly improved design
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable long-term reliability
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • PHEV nonsense
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.