Compare Skoda Superb B8 vs Chevrolet Sonic vs Skoda Rapid

Variants
1.4 TSI 125PS
1.4 TSI 150PS 4x4
1.4 TSI 150PS
1.4 TSI 150PS DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 150PS
2.0 TDI 150PS 4x4
2.0 TDI 150PS 7DSG
2.0 TDI 190PS
2.0 TDI 190PS 6DSG
2.0 TDI 190PS 6DSG 4x4
2.0 TDI 190PS 7DSG
2.0 TDI 190PS 7DSG 4x4
2.0 TSI 220PS 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 220PS DSG
2.0 TSI 272PS 4x4 DSG
2.0 TSI 280PS 4x4 DSG
1.2 70PS
1.2 86PS
1.3D 75PS
1.3D 95PS
1.4 100PS
1.4 100PS AT
1.6
1.6 AT
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 MPI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 MPI 110
1.6 MPI 110 AT
1.6 MPI 90
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 105

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
625 L / 22.1 cu-ft ~ 1760 L / 62.2 cu-ft
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1490 L / 52.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.0 deg
14.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.2 deg
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Independent, spring
Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
11.7 m / 38.4 ft
10.1 m / 33.0 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
136 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1468 mm / 57.8 in
1517 mm / 59.7 in
1461 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4861 mm / 191.4 in
4399 mm / 173.2 in
4483 mm / 176.5 in
Size | Width
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Wheelbase
2525 mm / 99.4 in
2602 mm / 102.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5

Reviews

Neofiliac score
45%
20%
13%
Pros
  • Low fuel consumption on paper
  • Bargain way to get a B8 Passat
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable long-term reliability
  • Questionable design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No fully independent suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.