Compare Opel Vectra C vs Hyundai Elantra 4 HD vs Chevrolet Sonic

Opel Vectra / Chevrolet Vectra / Holden Vectra / Vauxhall Vectra C Sedan (2002-2008)

Hyundai Elantra 4 (HD) Sedan (2006-2011)

Chevrolet Sonic (Aveo 2) Sedan (2011-2015)

Opel | Cars

Hyundai Motor | Cars

Chevrolet | Cars

Variants

1.6 105PS

1.6 Ecotec 100PS

1.8 140PS

1.8 140PS AT

1.8 Ecotect 122PS AT

1.9 CDTI 120PS

1.9 CDTI 150PS

1.9 CDTI 150PS AT

2.0 DTI 100PS

2.0 Turbo 175PS

2.2 155PS

2.2 AT

2.2 DTI 125PS

2.2 DTI 125PS AT

2.2 Ecotec 147PS

2.2 Ecotec 147PS AT

2.8 Turbo 230PS

2.8 Turbo 230PS AT

2.8 Turbo 250PS

2.8 Turbo 250PS AT

3.0 CDTI 177PS

3.0 CDTI 177PS AT

3.0 CDTI 184PS

3.0 CDTI 184PS AT

3.2 211PS

3.2 211PS AT

1.6 CRDi

1.6

1.6 AT

2.0

2.0 AT

1.2 70PS

1.2 86PS

1.3D 75PS

1.3D 95PS

1.4 100PS

1.4 100PS AT

1.6

1.6 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

460 L / 16.2 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

61.0 L / 16.1 gal

53.0 L / 14.0 gal

46.0 L / 12.2 gal

Passengers

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Disc

Brakes | Rear

Drum

Power Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

MacPherson

Suspension | Rear

Semi-independent

Transverse stabilizer

Torsion

Tire Size

185/65 R15

Turning Circle

10.0 m / 32.8 ft

11.3 m / 37.1 ft

10.1 m / 33.0 ft

Construction

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Platform

Epsilon

Hyundai-Kia J5 platform

Dimensions

Size | Height

1460 mm / 57.5 in

1490 mm / 58.7 in

1517 mm / 59.7 in

Size | Length

4505 mm / 177.4 in

4399 mm / 173.2 in

Size | Width

1798 mm / 70.8 in

1775 mm / 69.9 in

1735 mm / 68.3 in

Track Width | Front

1543.0 mm / 60.7 in

Track Width | Rear

1525.0 mm / 60.0 in

1541.0 mm / 60.7 in

Wheel Size

5.5J X 15

Wheelbase

2700 mm / 106.3 in

2690 mm / 105.9 in

2525 mm / 99.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Emission Standard

Euro 5

Production

Availability

2006 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score

12%

20%

Pros

Decent exterior design
Small turning circle

Somewhat improved build quality

Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
Small turning circle

Cons

Basic suspension set
Poor engine lineup
Bad reputation for reliability

Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Questionable design
Horrible 0-100kph time
Can't even reach 200km/h
Miserably low engine output
Only available with small engines
Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.