Compare Chrysler 300M vs Chrysler Concorde II
Variants
2.7
3.5
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft ~ 530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
500 kg / 1102 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Helical spring
Tire Size
225/55 R17
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler LH
Dimensions
Size | Height
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
5000 mm / 196.9 in
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Size | Width
1920 mm / 75.6 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
9.9:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
1998 ~ 2004
Reviews
Neofiliac score
17%
7%
Pros
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Decent power
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
- Outdated transmission
- Questionable design language
- Average build quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.