Compare Chrysler Sebring Sedan JS vs Chrysler Concorde II
Variants
2.0 6MT
2.0 4AT
2.2D 6MT
2.2D 4AT
2.4 6MT
2.4 4AT
2.7 6MT
2.7 4AT
3.5 6MT
3.5 4AT
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
441 L / 15.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
64.0 L / 16.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
215/55 R18
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Chrysler JS platform
Dimensions
Size | Height
1497 mm / 58.9 in
Size | Length
4850 mm / 190.9 in
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Size | Width
1843 mm / 72.6 in
Track Width | Front
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1570.0 mm / 61.8 in
Wheelbase
2767 mm / 108.9 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2006 ~ 2010
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
7%
Pros
- Fully-independent suspensions
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Questionable design decisions
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.