Compare Chrysler Sebring Sedan JR vs Chrysler Concorde II
Variants
2.0
2.0 5MT
2.4
2.7
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Length
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine
ECC
Engine | Redline
6464 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
7%
Pros
- Chrysler continued to improve it till the end
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.