Compare Chrysler Sebring Sedan JR vs Chrysler Concorde II

Variants
2.0
2.0 5MT
2.4
2.7
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Length
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in

Performance

Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine
ECC
Engine | Redline
6464 rpm
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
7%
Pros
  • Chrysler continued to improve it till the end
  • Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Simple rear suspension
  • Unique design language
  • Unreliable powertrain

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.