Compare Chrysler Sebring Sedan JR vs Chrysler LHS 2

Variants
2.0
2.0 5MT
2.4
2.7
3.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
61.0 L / 16.1 gal
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
475 kg / 1047 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Width
1890 mm / 74.4 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in

Performance

Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine
ECC
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Redline
6464 rpm
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
1999 ~ 2001

Reviews

Neofiliac score
12%
18%
Pros
  • Chrysler continued to improve it till the end
  • Lots of interior space
  • Some love the quirky design
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Poor reliability and build quality

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.