Compare Chrysler LHS 2 vs Chrysler Concorde II
Variants
3.5
2.7
3.2
3.5 237hp
3.5 258hp
3.5 Limited
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
530 L / 18.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Payload
475 kg / 1047 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Helical spring
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Length
5310 mm / 209.1 in
Size | Width
1890 mm / 74.4 in
Wheelbase
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
Performance
Acceleration | 0 - 100 km/h
9.1 sec
Acceleration | 0 - 60 mph
8.6 sec
Top Speed
210.0 km/h / 130.5 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (longitudinal), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
96.0 mm / 3.8 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 214.7 cu-in / 3518.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
1999 ~ 2001
Reviews
Neofiliac score
18%
7%
Pros
- Lots of interior space
- Some love the quirky design
- Chrysler certainly did not copy anyone's design homework
Cons
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Uninspiring handling
- Poor reliability and build quality
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Simple rear suspension
- Unique design language
- Unreliable powertrain
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.