Compare Acura TL 4 facelift vs Peugeot 407 vs Peugeot 607

Variants
3.5
3.7 SH-AWD MT
3.7 SH-AWD
1.6 HDi 110
1.8 115
2.0 HDi 135
2.0 135
2.0 135 AT
2.2 HDi 170
2.2 160
2.2 160 AT
3.0 210
2.2
2.2 AT
2.2 HDi
2.2 HDi AT
2.2 HDi
2.2 HDi AT
2.7 HDi AT
3.0 207PS
3.0 207PS AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
407 L / 14.4 cu-ft
481 L / 17.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.3 L / 4.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
80.0 L / 21.1 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent
Double-wishbone
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1452 mm / 57.2 in
1447 mm / 57.0 in
1437 mm / 56.6 in
Size | Length
4928 mm / 194.0 in
4877 mm / 192.0 in
Size | Width
1880 mm / 74.0 in
1811 mm / 71.3 in
1800 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1539.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1620.0 mm / 63.8 in
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Wheelbase
2775 mm / 109.3 in
2725 mm / 107.3 in
2800 mm / 110.2 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
159 ~ 160 g/km
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1850 kg / 4079 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4/V
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.2:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.6 cu-in / 3500.0 cc
Engine | Specific Output
80.0 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol V6 SOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2014

Reviews

Neofiliac score
49%
19%
18%
Pros
  • Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • New SH-AWD all-wheel drive system
  • Sweet 6-speed manual
  • Reliable V6 engines
  • Small turning circle
  • Easy to repair
  • Rather good manual transmission
  • Double-wishbone suspensions
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Questionable design choice (though arguably better than 508)
  • No powerful engine options
  • Boring design
  • Some engine reliability issues

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.