Compare Hyundai Grandeur 4 TG facelift vs Hyundai Sonata 4 EF facelift vs Hyundai Grandeur 5 HG

Variants
2.4
2.7
3.3
3.8
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 131hp
2.0 131hp AT
2.5 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
2.4
2.4 Hybrid
2.4 GDi
3.0 GDi
3.0
3.3

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
523 L / 18.5 cu-ft
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.8 L / 9.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.5 L / 5.8 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
325 kg / 717 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
162 mm / 6.4 in
151 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1422 mm / 56.0 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4747 mm / 186.9 in
4910 mm / 193.3 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1607.0 mm / 63.3 in
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2845 mm / 112.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.32
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 3
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2001 ~ 2004

Reviews

Neofiliac score
36%
29%
32%
Pros
  • Good double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Up-rated engines
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • More coherent styling
  • Improved styling
  • New engine optinos
  • Much improved exterior styling
  • Good interior quality
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Strong engine options
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only MacPherston strut front suspensions
  • Outdated transmissions
  • Basic MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.