Compare Hyundai Grandeur 4 TG vs Hyundai Sonata 4 EF facelift vs Hyundai Sonata 8
Variants
2.2 CRDi
2.4
2.7
3.3
3.8
1.8
1.8 AT
2.0 131hp
2.0 131hp AT
2.5 AT
2.7
2.7 AT
1.6 T-GDI AT
2.0 GDI Hybrid AT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 Turbo GDI AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
523 L / 18.5 cu-ft
430 L / 15.2 cu-ft
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.8 L / 9.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.9 L / 6.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
65.0 L / 17.2 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Vented 12"
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
solid 11.2"
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Steering Ratio
13.27x
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
36.1 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
162 mm / 6.4 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1422 mm / 56.0 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4747 mm / 186.9 in
4900 mm / 192.9 in
Size | Width
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1859 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1530.0 mm / 60.2 in
1623.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
245 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
0.32
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Euro 3
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6, 2.0, 2.5 L
Engine | Type
I4 Smartstream: G1.6 T-GDi, G2.0 LPi, G2.0 MPi, G2.0 GDi (Hybrid); G2.5 MPi, G2.5 GDi
Fuel Capacity
13.2 gal
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6- or 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic
Production
Availability
2001 ~ 2004
2020
Debut
2019-03
Made In
South Korea, US, China
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
29%
37%
Pros
- Good engine options
- Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved styling
- New engine optinos
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Decent performance
- Decent exterior styling
Cons
- Uninspiring design borrowed from elsewhere
- Bad 0-100kph time
- No powerful engine options
- Only MacPherston strut front suspensions
- Outdated transmissions
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.