Compare Hyundai Grandeur 4 TG vs Ford Mondeo 3 Liftback vs Ford Mondeo 2
Variants
2.2 CRDi
2.4
2.7
3.3
3.8
1.6 120
1.6D 115
1.6 EcoBoost 160
1.6 110
1.6 125
1.8D 100
1.8D 125
2.0 EcoBoost 203 AT
2.0 EcoBoost 240 AT
2.0 145
2.0D 115
2.0D 130
2.0D 140
2.0D 140 AT
2.0D 163
2.0D 163 AT
2.2D 175
2.2D 200
2.3 160
2.5 220
1.8 110hp
1.8 125hp
1.8 130hp
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 115hp
2.0D 115hp AT
2.0D 90hp
2.0D 130hp
2.0D 130hp AT
2.2D
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
ST
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
523 L / 18.5 cu-ft
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.8 L / 9.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.9 L / 6.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Liftback Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
162 mm / 6.4 in
110 mm / 4.3 in
Size | Height
1500 mm / 59.1 in
1429 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4731 mm / 186.3 in
Size | Width
1812 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
Wheel Size
16 in
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
245 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Towing Capacity
745 kg / 1642 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 8% gradient) | 1600 kg / 3527 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
31%
16%
Pros
- Good engine options
- Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Decent engine options
- Relatively high reliability
- Rather spacious
Cons
- Uninspiring design borrowed from elsewhere
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with basic suspension setup
- Lack of refinement
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.