Compare Hyundai Grandeur 4 TG vs Hyundai Accent LC vs Kia Rio 4 Sedan
Variants
2.2 CRDi
2.4
2.7
3.3
3.8
1.3 75hp
1.3 86hp
1.3 86hp AT
1.5 102hp
1.5 102hp AT
1.5 92hp
1.5 92hp AT
1.5 CRDi
1.5 GT
1.6
1.6 AT
1.6
1.6 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
523 L / 18.5 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.8 L / 9.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.9 L / 6.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Drum
Drum
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Tire Size
185/65 R15
Turning Circle
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
162 mm / 6.4 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4384 mm / 172.6 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1435.0 mm / 56.5 in
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1529.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2440 mm / 96.1 in
2581 mm / 101.6 in
Performance
CO2 Emission
245 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
g4ea
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Power
130.0 hp / 96.9 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
81.7 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
161 Nm / 118.7 lb-ft @ 4850 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2017 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
35%
8%
19%
Pros
- Good engine options
- Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Reasonably reliable
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Uninspiring design borrowed from elsewhere
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Uninspiring styling
- Poor handling
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.