Compare Hyundai Sonata 6 YF vs Hyundai Grandeur 4 TG vs Hyundai Sonata 8

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 Turbo AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4 GDi
2.4 GDi AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.2 CRDi
2.4
2.7
3.3
3.8
1.6 T-GDI AT
2.0 GDI Hybrid AT
2.5 GDI AT
2.5 Turbo GDI AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
523 L / 18.5 cu-ft
453 L / 16.0 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.1 L / 6.4 qt
8.8 L / 9.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
5.9 L / 6.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Vented 12"
Brakes | Rear
Disc
solid 11.2"
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Steering Ratio
13.27x
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
162 mm / 6.4 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1445 mm / 56.9 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4900 mm / 192.9 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in
1859 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1633.0 mm / 64.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1623.0 mm / 63.9 in
Wheelbase
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2840 mm / 111.8 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
245 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Displacement
1.6, 2.0, 2.5 L
Engine | Type
I4 Smartstream: G1.6 T-GDi, G2.0 LPi, G2.0 MPi, G2.0 GDi (Hybrid); G2.5 MPi, G2.5 GDi
Fuel Capacity
13.2 gal
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
5-speed
6- or 8-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2020
Debut
2019-03
Made In
South Korea, US, China

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
35%
37%
Pros
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Distinct styling
  • Good engine options
  • Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance
  • Decent exterior styling
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring design borrowed from elsewhere
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.