Compare Hyundai Sonata 6 YF vs Toyota Camry 6 vs Toyota Avalon 1

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 Turbo AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4 GDi
2.4 GDi AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.4 158hp
2.4 158hp AT
2.4 167hp
2.4 167hp AT
2.4 Hybrid
3.5 268hp AT
3.5 277hp AT

Capacity

Coolant Capacity
6.1 L / 6.4 qt
9.3 L / 9.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
275 kg / 606 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Helical spring
Tire Size
205/65 R15 H
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4845 mm / 190.7 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in
1820 mm / 71.7 in
1785 mm / 70.3 in
Track Width | Front
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1520.0 mm / 59.8 in
Weight
1470.0 kg / 3240.8 lbs
Wheelbase
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2720 mm / 107.1 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
10.5 L/100km / 22.4 MPG (combined)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine
1MZ-FE
Engine | Bore
87.5 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.5:1
Engine | Displacement
3.0 L / 182.7 cu-in / 2994.0 cc
Engine | Power
200.0 hp / 149.1 kW @ 5400 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
66.8 hp/L / 1.1 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
83.0 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Torque
284 Nm / 209.5 lb-ft @ 4400 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2009
1994 ~ 2000

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
42%
17%
Pros
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Distinct styling
  • Robust engine options
  • Proven to be exceptionally reliable
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Very reliable V6 engine
  • Clean styling
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Boring

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.