HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Hyundai Sonata 6 YF vs Hyundai Elantra 5 MD vs Hyundai Elantra 6 AD facelift

Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 Turbo AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4 GDi
2.4 GDi AT
2.4 Hybrid
1.8
1.8 AT
1.4 Turbo GDI DCT
2.0
2.0 AT
Sport 1.6 Turbo GDI
Sport 1.6 Turbo GDI DCT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.1 L / 6.4 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Torsion
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.6 m / 34.8 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4529 mm / 178.3 in
4620 mm / 181.9 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1800 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Wheelbase
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.1 L/100km / 33.1 MPG (combined) | 8.1 L/100km / 29.0 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed

Production

Availability
2010 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
29%
12%
20%
Pros
  • Good 0.25 drag coefficient
  • Distinct styling
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved styling
  • Improved build quality
  • Independent rear suspension on Elantra Sport
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not fully independent rear suspensions
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Semi-independent suspension on standard model

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.