Compare Hyundai Sonata 6 YF vs Toyota Camry 6 facelift vs Toyota Avalon 3
Variants
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0 Turbo AT
2.4
2.4 AT
2.4 GDi
2.4 GDi AT
2.4 Hybrid
2.4 Hybrid
2.5 169hp
2.5 179hp AT
3.5 AT
2004
2005
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.1 L / 6.4 qt
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.7 L / 5.0 qt
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 297.18 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc, 276.86 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 215/55 R17
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
11.0 m / 36.1 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Platform
Toyota K platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1470 mm / 57.9 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4820 mm / 189.8 in
4806 mm / 189.2 in
5010 mm / 197.2 in
Size | Width
1835 mm / 72.2 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1575.0 mm / 62.0 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Weight
1583.0 kg / 3489.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2795 mm / 110.0 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.291
Fuel Economy
10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (urban) | 7.6 L/100km / 31.0 MPG (highway)
Towing Capacity
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
2GR-FE
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic ECT-i
Production
Availability
2009 ~ 2011
Reviews
Neofiliac score
29%
45%
24%
Pros
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Distinct styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Improved I4 engine
- Newer 6-speed automatic transmissions for the I4s
- Exceptionally reliable V6 engine
- Lots of space inside
- Good 0.29 drag coefficient
Cons
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.