Compare Hyundai Elantra 6 AD vs Hyundai Accent LC vs Hyundai Elantra 5 MD
Variants
1.4 DCT
2.0 MT
2.0 AT
1.3 75hp
1.3 86hp
1.3 86hp AT
1.5 102hp
1.5 102hp AT
1.5 92hp
1.5 92hp AT
1.5 CRDi
1.5 GT
1.6
1.6 AT
1.8
1.8 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
375 L / 13.2 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Drum
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion bar
Torsion
Tire Size
195/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
Size | Length
4569 mm / 179.9 in
4529 mm / 178.3 in
Size | Width
1801 mm / 70.9 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
1435.0 mm / 56.5 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1572.0 mm / 61.9 in
1425.0 mm / 56.1 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2440 mm / 96.1 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.1 L/100km / 33.1 MPG (combined) | 8.1 L/100km / 29.0 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
g4ea
G4NB
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2016 ~ 2019
2010 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
8%
12%
Pros
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Improved drivetrain range
- Better styling
- Reasonably reliable
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved styling
- Improved build quality
Cons
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Budget suspension setup
- No independent rear suspension
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Uninspiring styling
- Poor handling
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not fully independent rear suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.