Compare Hyundai Elantra 5 MD vs Hyundai Elantra 6 AD facelift vs Hyundai Grandeur 5 HG
Variants
1.8
1.8 AT
1.4 Turbo GDI DCT
2.0
2.0 AT
Sport 1.6 Turbo GDI
Sport 1.6 Turbo GDI DCT
2.4
2.4 Hybrid
2.4 GDi
3.0 GDi
3.0
3.3
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.6 m / 34.8 ft
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
151 mm / 5.9 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1470 mm / 57.9 in
Size | Length
4529 mm / 178.3 in
4620 mm / 181.9 in
4910 mm / 193.3 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1860 mm / 73.2 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1606.0 mm / 63.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
1607.0 mm / 63.3 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2845 mm / 112.0 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.29
Fuel Economy
7.1 L/100km / 33.1 MPG (combined) | 8.1 L/100km / 29.0 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Euro 4
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2015
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
20%
32%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved styling
- Improved build quality
- Independent rear suspension on Elantra Sport
- Much improved exterior styling
- Good interior quality
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Strong engine options
Cons
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not fully independent rear suspensions
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Semi-independent suspension on standard model
- Basic MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.