Compare Hyundai Elantra 5 MD vs Hyundai Elantra 4 HD vs Skoda Rapid
Variants
1.8
1.8 AT
1.6 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 MPI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 MPI 110
1.6 MPI 110 AT
1.6 MPI 90
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 105
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1490 L / 52.6 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Transverse stabilizer
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
185/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.1 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback
Platform
Hyundai-Kia J5 platform
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
136 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1490 mm / 58.7 in
1461 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4529 mm / 178.3 in
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4483 mm / 176.5 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
Wheel Size
5.5J X 15
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2602 mm / 102.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.1 L/100km / 33.1 MPG (combined) | 8.1 L/100km / 29.0 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2010 ~ 2015
2006 ~ 2011
Reviews
Neofiliac score
12%
3%
13%
Pros
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Improved styling
- Improved build quality
- Somewhat improved build quality
- Low official fuel consumption
Cons
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Not fully independent rear suspensions
- Horrible 0-100kph time
- Can't even reach 200km/h
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Bad 0-100kph time
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small, unreliable engines
- No fully independent suspensions
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.