HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Hyundai Elantra 4 HD vs Hyundai Elantra 5 MD vs Hyundai Elantra 3 XD

Variants
1.6 CRDi
1.6
1.6 AT
2.0
2.0 AT
1.8
1.8 AT
1.6
1.6 AT
1.8
2.0 139hp
2.0 139hp AT
2.0D
2.0 143hp
2.0 143hp AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
419 L / 14.8 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
4.0 L / 4.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
53.0 L / 14.0 gal
48.0 L / 12.7 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Disc
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Transverse stabilizer
Torsion
Spring Strut
Tire Size
185/65 R15
Turning Circle
11.3 m / 37.1 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Platform
Hyundai-Kia J5 platform

Dimensions

Size | Height
1490 mm / 58.7 in
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1425 mm / 56.1 in
Size | Length
4505 mm / 177.4 in
4529 mm / 178.3 in
4495 mm / 177.0 in
Size | Width
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
1720 mm / 67.7 in
Track Width | Front
1543.0 mm / 60.7 in
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1485.0 mm / 58.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1541.0 mm / 60.7 in
1562.0 mm / 61.5 in
Wheel Size
5.5J X 15
15 in
Wheelbase
2690 mm / 105.9 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2610 mm / 102.8 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Fuel Economy
7.1 L/100km / 33.1 MPG (combined) | 8.1 L/100km / 29.0 MPG (urban) | 5.9 L/100km / 39.9 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
G4NB
Engine | Bore
81.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.3:1
Engine | Displacement
1.8 L / 109.7 cu-in / 1797.0 cc
Engine | Power
148.0 hp / 110.4 kW @ 6500 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
82.4 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Stroke
87.1 mm / 3.4 in
Engine | Torque
178 Nm / 131.3 lb-ft @ 4700 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2006 ~ 2011
2010 ~ 2015

Reviews

Neofiliac score
3%
12%
8%
Pros
  • Somewhat improved build quality
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Improved styling
  • Improved build quality
  • Affordable
Cons
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not fully independent rear suspensions
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.