Compare Mercedes S-class W222 facelift vs Skoda Octavia 4 vs Peugeot 508 facelift

Variants
AMG S 63 L 4MATIC
AMG S 65 L
S 350d L 4MATIC
S 350d 4MATIC
S 350d
S 350d L
S 400d 4MATIC
S 400d L 4MATIC
S 400d L
S 400d
S 450 4MATIC
S 450 L 4MATIC
S 450
S 450 L
S 500 L
S 500
S 560 L 4MATIC
S 560 4MATIC
S 560 L
S 560
S 560e L
S 600 L
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
1.6 BlueHDi 120
1.6 BlueHDi 120 AT
1.6 e-HDi 115
1.6 e-HDi 115 AT
e-THP 165
e-THP 165 AT
VTi 120 AT
2.0 BlueHDi 150
2.0 BlueHDi 180 AT
2.0 HDi 140
2.0 HDi 160
2.0 HDi 160 AT
HYbrid4
2.2 HDi 204 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
72.0 L / 19.0 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
12.2 m / 40.0 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
146 mm / 5.7 in
Size | Height
1456 mm / 57.3 in
Size | Length
4830 mm / 190.2 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1579.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
Wheelbase
2817 mm / 110.9 in

Performance

Top Speed
250.0 km/h / 155.3 mph

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6

Reviews

Neofiliac score
87%
37%
19%
Pros
  • The last of the M279 bi-turbo V12s
  • Return of I6 engines
  • Superb suspension setup
  • Ingenious MBC hydraulic suspension
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
  • Small turning circle
  • Some towing capacity
  • Slightly improved design
Cons
  • S63 AMG became AWD only
  • Downsized drivetrain with high turbo boost
  • Somewhat over-styled yet still generic
  • Too many electronics
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.