Compare Mercedes E-class W213 vs Mercedes CLA C118 vs Kia Optima 4
Variants
AMG E 43 4MATIC
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 S 4MATIC+
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200 MT
E 200d
E 220d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 250
E 300
E 300 Euro6d
E 300d
E 300de PHEV
E 300e PHEV
E 350
E 350d
E 350d 4MATIC
E 350d Euro6d
E 350e PHEV
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
AMG CLA 35 4MATIC
AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+
CLA 180 MT
CLA 180
CLA 180d
CLA 200 MT
CLA 200
CLA 200d
CLA 220 4MATIC
CLA 220
CLA 220d
CLA 250 4MATIC
CLA 250
CLA 250e
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi DCT
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 PHEV
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
GT AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
15.6 kWh (gross)
Battery | Type
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
360.0 V
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
104 mm / 4.1 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Length
4688 mm / 184.6 in
Track Width | Front
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2939 mm / 115.7 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
Electric Range
72.0 km / 44.7 mi
54.0 km / 33.6 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Reviews
Neofiliac score
80%
35%
51%
Pros
- Undeniably great performance figures
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Multi-link suspension setup all-around
- Decent performance in the AMG models
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Addition of DCT
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.6L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- AWD (4MATIC) is forced on consumers
- Somewhat genertic styling
- Downsized engined with lots of electronics
- Too many displays (and distractions) inside
- Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Ugly
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.