Compare Mercedes C-class W205 vs Mercedes CLA C118 vs Ford Fusion 2 facelift

Variants
AMG C 43 4MATIC
AMG C 63
AMG C 63 S
C 160 MT
C 180 7AT
C 180 9AT
C 180 MT
C 180d 7AT
C 180d MT
C 200 4MATIC 7AT
C 200 4MATIC 9AT
C 200 7AT
C 200 9AT
C 200 MT
C 200d 7AT
C 200d MT
C 220d 4MATIC 9AT
C 220d 7AT
C 220d 9AT
C 220d BlueEFFICIENCY Edition 7AT
C 220d MT
C 250 7AT
C 250 9AT
C 250d 4MATIC 7AT
C 250d 4MATIC 9AT
C 250d 7AT
C 250d 9AT
C 300 7AT
C 300 9AT
C 300h HYBRID 7AT
C 350e PHEV 7AT
C 400 4MATIC 7AT
C 400 4MATIC 9AT
C 450 4MATIC AMG
AMG CLA 35 4MATIC
AMG CLA 45 4MATIC+
AMG CLA 45 S 4MATIC+
CLA 180 MT
CLA 180
CLA 180d
CLA 200 MT
CLA 200
CLA 200d
CLA 220 4MATIC
CLA 220
CLA 220d
CLA 250 4MATIC
CLA 250
CLA 250e
1.5T AT
PHEV
Hybrid
2.0T AT
2.0T AWD AT
2.5 AT
2.7T AWD AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
460 L / 16.2 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
13.5 deg
13.4 deg
Offroad | Breakover Angle
9.4 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
14.2 deg
14.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.1 m / 36.4 ft
11.5 m / 37.7 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
15.6 kWh (gross)

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
92 mm / 3.6 in
104 mm / 4.1 in
Size | Length
4688 mm / 184.6 in
4872 mm / 191.8 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in | 2121 mm / 83.5 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1612.0 mm / 63.5 in
Wheelbase
2840 mm / 111.8 in
2729 mm / 107.4 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.24
0.30
Electric Range
72.0 km / 44.7 mi

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 6
Engine | Bore
72.2 mm / 2.8 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.6:1
Engine | Stroke
81.4 mm / 3.2 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2016 ~ 2018

Reviews

Neofiliac score
86%
35%
49%
Pros
  • Lots of power in the C63 AMG models
  • Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Decent performance in the AMG models
  • Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
  • Lots of space inside
  • Overall good styling
Cons
  • Addicted to 4MATIC
  • Somewhat generic styling
  • Mass-produced "AMG" engines not true to AMG
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Ugly
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring driving dynamics

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.