Compare Mercedes C-class W204 facelift vs Mercedes E-class W213 vs Skoda Octavia 4
Variants
C 63 AMG
C 180
C 180 CDI
C 180 CDI MT
C 180 MT
C 200
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 MT
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY MT
C 250
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI 4MATIC
C 250 CDI MT
C 300 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 4MATIC
C 350
C 350 4MATIC
C 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 63 AMG Performance
AMG E 43 4MATIC
AMG E 53 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 4MATIC+
AMG E 63 S 4MATIC+
E 200
E 200 4MATIC
E 200 MT
E 200d
E 220d
E 220d 4MATIC
E 250
E 300
E 300 Euro6d
E 300d
E 300de PHEV
E 300e PHEV
E 350
E 350d
E 350d 4MATIC
E 350d Euro6d
E 350e PHEV
E 400 4MATIC
E 400d 4MATIC
E 450 4MATIC
1.0 TSI
1.0 TSI DSG
1.5 TGI
1.5 TGI DSG
1.5 TSI
1.5 TSI DSG
2.0 TDI 116
2.0 TDI 116 DSG
2.0 TDI 150
2.0 TDI 150 AWD DSG
2.0 TDI 150 DSG
2.0 TDI 200 AWD DSG
2.0 TSI 190 AWD DSG
1.4 TSI PHEV
RS
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.3 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.8 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Multi-link
Construction
Battery | Capacity
13.5 kWh (gross)
13.0 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
143 mm / 5.6 in
Size | Height
1447 mm / 57.0 in
Size | Width
1829 mm / 72.0 in | 2003 mm / 78.9 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1619.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheelbase
2760 mm / 108.7 in
2939 mm / 115.7 in
Performance
Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
Powertrain
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Redline
8000 rpm
Reviews
Neofiliac score
84%
80%
37%
Pros
- Last chance to get M156 in C63 AMG
- Somewhat improved styling
- Reasonably reliable engine lineup
- Good towing capacity
- Undeniably great performance figures
- Excellent 0.23 drag coefficient
- Multi-link suspension setup all-around
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.2L/100km fuel consumption (PHEV)
- Small turning circle
- Some towing capacity
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- AWD (4MATIC) is forced on consumers
- Somewhat genertic styling
- Downsized engined with lots of electronics
- Too many displays (and distractions) inside
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.