Compare Mercedes C-class W204 facelift vs Cadillac XTS vs Cadillac CT4

Variants
C 63 AMG
C 180
C 180 CDI
C 180 CDI MT
C 180 MT
C 200
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 MT
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 220 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY MT
C 250
C 250 CDI
C 250 CDI 4MATIC
C 250 CDI MT
C 300 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY 4MATIC
C 350
C 350 4MATIC
C 350 CDI BlueEFFICIENCY
C 63 AMG Performance
3.6L V6
3.6L V6 AWD
3.6T V6
2.0 Turbo
2.0 Turbo AWD
2.7 Turbo
2.7 Turbo AWD
CT4-V
CT4-V BLACKWING

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
475 L / 16.8 cu-ft
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
303 L / 10.7 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
66.0 L / 17.4 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
Independent, spring
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Independent, spring, Pneumatic
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/45 R19, 245/40 R20
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1447 mm / 57.0 in
1510 mm / 59.4 in
Size | Length
5131 mm / 202.0 in
Size | Width
1852 mm / 72.9 in
Track Width | Front
1549.0 mm / 61.0 in
1582.0 mm / 62.3 in
1532.0 mm / 60.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1552.0 mm / 61.1 in
1587.0 mm / 62.5 in
1568.0 mm / 61.7 in
Wheel Size
19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2760 mm / 108.7 in
2837 mm / 111.7 in
2775 mm

Performance

Towing Capacity
750 kg / 1653 lbs (w/o brakes) | 1800 kg / 3968 lbs (w/ brakes @ 12% gradient)
454 kg / 1001 lbs (w/o brakes)

Powertrain

Emission Standard
Euro 5
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Displacement
3.6 L / 217.5 cu-in / 3564.0 cc
Engine | Redline
8000 rpm
Engine | Stroke
85.6 mm / 3.4 in
Final Drive
2.85
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic Hydra-Matic
Automatic

Production

Availability
2012 ~ 2018
Debut
2019-10
Made In
US: Michigan, China: Shanghai

Reviews

Neofiliac score
84%
26%
85%
Pros
  • Last chance to get M156 in C63 AMG
  • Somewhat improved styling
  • Reasonably reliable engine lineup
  • Good towing capacity
  • Very spacious interior
  • Rather powerful 3.6TT engine for FWD
  • Beautiful design
  • Good build quality
  • Superb performance in the CT4-V
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Not the best handling choice
  • Doesn't feel special
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Low cargo capacity

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.