HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Mercedes C-class W203 facelift vs Skoda Superb B6 vs Skoda Rapid

Variants
C 30 CDI AMG
C 55 AMG
C 180 Kompressor MT
C 180 Kompressor
C 200 CDI MT
C 200 CDI
C 200 CDI DPF
C 200 CDI DPF MT
C 200 CGI MT
C 200 Kompressor MT
C 200 Kompressor
C 220 CDI MT
C 220 CDI
C 220 CDI DPF
C 220 CDI DPF MT
C 230 MT
C 230
C 230 Kompressor MT US
C 230 Kompressor US
C 230 Kompressor MT
C 240 MT
C 240 4MATIC
C 240
C 270 CDI MT
C 270 CDI
C 280 MT
C 280 4MATIC
C 280
C 320 MT
C 320 4MATIC
C 320
C 320 CDI MT
C 320 CDI
C 350 MT
C 350 4MATIC
C 350
1.4 TSI
1.6 TDI
1.8 TSI
1.8 TSI 4x4
1.8 TSI DSG
1.9 TDI
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 140PS
2.0 TDI 170PS
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG
2.0 TDI 170PS DSG 4x4
2.0 TSI
3.6 FSI DSG 4x4
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 MPI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 MPI 110
1.6 MPI 110 AT
1.6 MPI 90
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 105

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1490 L / 52.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
62.0 L / 16.4 gal
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Rear
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.5 deg
14.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.0 deg
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Semi-independent, Torsion
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.3 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
139 mm / 5.5 in
136 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1461 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4838 mm / 190.5 in
4483 mm / 176.5 in
Track Width | Rear
1518.0 mm / 59.8 in
Wheelbase
2715 mm / 106.9 in
2761 mm / 108.7 in
2602 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0
39.0 m / 127.9 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.30

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6000 rpm

Reviews

Neofiliac score
76%
60%
13%
Pros
  • Reintroduction of C55 AMG
  • Slightly less rusty
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Rather clean exterior styling
  • Very competitive vis-a-vis B6/B7 Passat
  • Interesting engine lineup
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Troublesome 7G-Tronic transmission
  • Non-AMG models still looked "off"
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • FSI problems
  • DSG problems
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No fully independent suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.