Compare Mercedes C-class W203 facelift vs Acura TLX vs Acura Integra 3 Sedan

Mercedes-Benz C-class W203 facelift Sedan (2004-2007)

Acura / Honda Integra Integra 3 (DB/DC) Sedan (1994-2001)

Mercedes-Benz | Cars

Acura | Cars

Variants

C 30 CDI AMG

C 55 AMG

C 180 Kompressor MT

C 180 Kompressor

C 200 CDI MT

C 200 CDI

C 200 CDI DPF

C 200 CDI DPF MT

C 200 CGI MT

C 200 Kompressor MT

C 200 Kompressor

C 220 CDI MT

C 220 CDI

C 220 CDI DPF

C 220 CDI DPF MT

C 230 MT

C 230

C 230 Kompressor MT US

C 230 Kompressor US

C 230 Kompressor MT

C 240 MT

C 240 4MATIC

C 240

C 270 CDI MT

C 270 CDI

C 280 MT

C 280 4MATIC

C 280

C 320 MT

C 320 4MATIC

C 320

C 320 CDI MT

C 320 CDI

C 350 MT

C 350 4MATIC

C 350

2.4

3.5

3.5 SH-AWD

1.8 141hp

1.8 141hp AT

1.8 170hp

1.8 196hp

Capacity

Cargo Capacity

374 L / 13.2 cu-ft

311 L / 11.0 cu-ft

Fuel Capacity

62.0 L / 16.4 gal

65.0 L / 17.2 gal

50.0 L / 13.2 gal

Passengers

Payload

430 kg / 948 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front

Ventilated discs

Brakes | Rear

Disc

Power Steering

Hydraulic Steering

Electric Steering

Suspension | Front

MacPherson strut

Double-wishbone

Suspension | Rear

Multi-link

Turning Circle

10.8 m / 35.3 ft

10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Body Style

4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance

150 mm / 5.9 in

Size | Height

1448 mm / 57.0 in

1370 mm / 53.9 in

Size | Length

4834 mm / 190.3 in

4525 mm / 178.1 in

Size | Width

1854 mm / 73.0 in

1710 mm / 67.3 in

Track Width | Front

1595.0 mm / 62.8 in

1476.0 mm / 58.1 in

Track Width | Rear

1603.0 mm / 63.1 in

1468.0 mm / 57.8 in

Wheelbase

2715 mm / 106.9 in

2776 mm / 109.3 in

2620 mm / 103.1 in

Performance

Braking | 100 km/h - 0

39.0 m / 127.9 ft

Coefficient Of Drag

0.28

0.34

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout

Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive

Engine | Bore

81.0 mm / 3.2 in

Engine | Redline

6000 rpm

Engine | Type

Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder

Production

Availability

2014 ~ 2017

1994 ~ 2001

Reviews

Neofiliac score

76%

35%

13%

Pros

Reintroduction of C55 AMG
Slightly less rusty
Good 0.26 drag coefficient
Good towing capacity

Much better 8- and 9-speed automatic transmissions
Good 0.28 drag coefficient
Some styling improvements

Great VTEC engine
Smooth manual transmission

Cons

Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Troublesome 7G-Tronic transmission
Non-AMG models still looked "off"

Downgraded to MacPherson struts
Lost manual transmission

Only available with small engines
Low cargo capacity
Questionable styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)

Remove

Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above

Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.