Compare Toyota Crown 14 vs Toyota Avalon 5 vs Toyota Avalon 3

Variants
Athlete 2.0T
Athlete 2.5
Athlete 2.5 Four 6AT
Athlete 2.5 Four 8AT
Athlete 2.5 Four Hybrid
Athlete 2.5 Hybrid
Athlete 3.5
Royal 2.5
Royal 2.5 Four
Royal 2.5 Four Hybrid
Royal 2.5 Hybrid
2.5 Hybrid
3.5
2004
2005

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
456 L / 16.1 cu-ft
408 L / 14.4 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.3 L / 8.8 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
6.2 L / 6.6 qt
Fuel Capacity
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs, 297.18 mm
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc, 276.86 mm
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Transverse stabilizer
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 215/55 R17
Turning Circle
11.5 m / 37.7 ft
11.2 m / 36.7 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
Platform
Toyota N platform
Toyota K platform

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1435 mm / 56.5 in
1485 mm / 58.5 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4976 mm / 195.9 in
5010 mm / 197.2 in
Size | Width
1800 mm / 70.9 in
1849 mm / 72.8 in
1850 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1545.0 mm / 60.8 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Weight
1583.0 kg / 3489.9 lbs
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7J x 17
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2870 mm / 113.0 in
2820 mm / 111.0 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.291
Fuel Economy
10.7 L/100km / 22.0 MPG (urban) | 7.6 L/100km / 31.0 MPG (highway)

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
ULEV
Engine
2GR-FE
Engine | Bore
94.0 mm / 3.7 in
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.8:1
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 210.9 cu-in / 3456.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
83.1 mm / 3.3 in
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
8-speed or CVT
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic or hybrid (eCVT)
Automatic ECT-i

Production

Availability
2018
Debut
2018 NAIAS
Made In
USA, China

Reviews

Neofiliac score
74%
46%
24%
Pros
  • Superb double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Small turning circle
  • Wonderful fit and finish
  • Excellent exterior styling
  • Handsome styling
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good interior space
  • Exceptional reliability
  • Exceptionally reliable V6 engine
  • Lots of space inside
  • Good 0.29 drag coefficient
Cons
  • Downsized engines
  • No more V8
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.