HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Toyota Avensis 3 vs Toyota Corolla 11 vs Skoda Rapid

Variants
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.2D
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 177hp
1.33
1.4 D-4D
1.6
1.6 CVT
1.0 TSI 110
1.0 TSI 95
1.0 TSI 95 AT
1.2 MPI 75
1.2 TSI 105
1.2 TSI 110
1.2 TSI 85
1.2 TSI 90
1.2 TSI 90 DSG
1.4 TDI 90
1.4 TDI 90 AT
1.4 TDI 90 DSG
1.4 TSI 122
1.4 TSI 125 AT
1.4 TSI 125 DSG
1.6 MPI 110
1.6 MPI 110 AT
1.6 MPI 90
1.6 TDI 115
1.6 TDI 116
1.6 TDI 105

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
452 L / 16.0 cu-ft
550 L / 19.4 cu-ft ~ 1490 L / 52.6 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
55.0 L / 14.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Offroad | Approach Angle
14.0 deg
Offroad | Departure Angle
12.3 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Semi-independent, Torsion
Tire Size
195/65 R15, 205/55 R16
Turning Circle
10.8 m / 35.4 ft
10.9 m / 35.8 ft

Construction

Body Style
5-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
5-door Hatchback

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
125 mm / 4.9 in
136 mm / 5.4 in
Size | Height
1480 mm / 58.3 in
1465 mm / 57.7 in
1461 mm / 57.5 in
Size | Length
4695 mm / 184.8 in
4620 mm / 181.9 in
4483 mm / 176.5 in
Size | Width
1810 mm / 71.3 in
1775 mm / 69.9 in
Track Width | Front
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1535.0 mm / 60.4 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 18 in
15 in, 16 in
Wheelbase
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in
2602 mm / 102.4 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.27

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5 J
Transmission | Gears
6-speed

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2011
2012 ~ 2019

Reviews

Neofiliac score
19%
21%
13%
Pros
  • Somewhat improved styling
  • Very reliable engines
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Low official fuel consumption
Cons
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Use of CVT for petrol
  • Only FWD
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Symbol of boring
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small, unreliable engines
  • No fully independent suspensions

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.