HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Audi A6 C7 vs Toyota Avensis 3 vs Toyota Camry 8

Variants
2.0 TFSI quattro AT
2.0 TDI 136PS
2.0 TDI 136PS CVT
2.0 TDI 177PS
2.0 TDI 177PS CVT
2.0 TFSI 180PS
2.0 TFSI 180PS CVT
2.0 TFSI 211PS CVT
2.0 TFSI 211PS quattro AT
2.0 TFSI Hybrid
2.8 FSI
2.8 FSI CVT
2.8 FSI quattro DCT
3.0 BiTDI quattro AT
3.0 TDI 204PS
3.0 TDI 204PS CVT
3.0 TDI 204PS quattro DCT
3.0 TDI 245PS quattro DCT
3.0 TDI clean diesel quattro DCT
3.0 TFSI 300PS quattro DCT
3.0 TFSI 310PS quattro DCT
1.6
1.8
1.8 CVT
2.0
2.0 CVT
2.0D
2.2D
2.2D 150hp AT
2.2D 177hp
2.0
2.5 6AT
2.5 8AT
2.5 Hybrid
3.5

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
509 L / 18.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.9 m / 39.0 ft
10.8 m / 35.4 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.3 kWh (gross)
Body Style
5-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
117 mm / 4.6 in
127 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1468 mm / 57.8 in
1480 mm / 58.3 in
Size | Length
4915 mm / 193.5 in
4695 mm / 184.8 in
Size | Width
1874 mm / 73.8 in | 2086 mm / 82.1 in (mirror unfolded)
1810 mm / 71.3 in
Track Width | Front
1627.0 mm / 64.1 in
1550.0 mm / 61.0 in
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
Track Width | Rear
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
1590.0 mm / 62.6 in
Wheel Size
16 in, 17 in, 18 in
Wheelbase
2912 mm / 114.6 in
2700 mm / 106.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
98 ~ 101 g/km

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Redline
6500 rpm

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2011

Reviews

Neofiliac score
61%
19%
44%
Pros
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Interesting suparcharged V6 and 3.0 TDI engine options
  • Up to 650Nm of torque
  • Good 0.26 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Somewhat improved styling
  • Very reliable engines
  • High reliability
  • Good comfort
  • Decent handling
Cons
  • CVT is widely used
  • FSI engine unreliability issue still lingers
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Use of CVT for petrol
  • Only FWD
  • Bland styling

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.