Compare Volkswagen Passat B5.5 vs Hyundai Grandeur 4 TG vs Hyundai Grandeur 3 XG facelift

Variants
1.6
1.8T 150hp
1.8T 150hp AT
1.8T 170hp
1.8T 170hp AT
1.9 TDI 100hp
1.9 TDI 100hp AT
1.9 TDI 130hp 4Motion
1.9 TDI 130hp 5MT
1.9 TDI 130hp 6MT
1.9 TDI 130hp AT
2.0
2.3
2.3 4Motion
2.3 AT
2.5 TDI 4Motion
2.5 TDI 4Motion AT
2.8 4Motion
2.8 4Motion AT
4.0 4Motion
4.0 4Motion AT
2.2 CRDi
2.4
2.7
3.3
3.8
2.0 MT
2.0 AT
2.5 AT
3.0 AT
3.5 AT

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
523 L / 18.5 cu-ft
410 L / 14.5 cu-ft
Coolant Capacity
8.8 L / 9.3 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
5.9 L / 6.2 qt
Fuel Capacity
75.0 L / 19.8 gal
70.0 L / 18.5 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
683 kg / 1506 lbs

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
Multi-link
Double-wishbone
Double-wishbone
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Turning Circle
11.4 m / 37.4 ft
12.5 m / 41.0 ft
12.6 m / 41.3 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
162 mm / 6.4 in
160 mm / 6.3 in
Size | Height
1420 mm / 55.9 in
Size | Length
4895 mm / 192.7 in
4875 mm / 191.9 in
Size | Width
1800 mm / 70.9 in
Track Width | Front
1580.0 mm / 62.2 in
1540.0 mm / 60.6 in
Track Width | Rear
1565.0 mm / 61.6 in
Wheelbase
2780 mm / 109.4 in
2750 mm / 108.3 in

Performance

CO2 Emission
245 g/km
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
0.29

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 4
Engine | Compression Ratio
10.0:1
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated multi-port injected petrol V6 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
5-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic

Production

Availability
2003 ~ 2005

Reviews

Neofiliac score
62%
35%
18%
Pros
  • Very interesting W8 and VR5 engine options
  • Multi-link suspensions all-around
  • Good 0.27 drag coefficient
  • Good towing capacity
  • Good engine options
  • Great double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Good 0.28 drag coefficient
  • Unusual double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
  • Improved V6 engine range
Cons
  • Uninspiring design borrowed from elsewhere
  • No powerful engine options
  • Styling somewhat off

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.