HomeArticlesProductsKeywordsCompanies

Compare Ford Mondeo 4 vs Ford Mondeo 2 vs Ford Taurus 6

Variants
1.0T
1.5T
1.5T AT
1.5D
1.5D Econetic
1.6D
1.6D Econetic
2.0T 203hp AT
2.0T 240hp AT
Hybrid
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AWD
2.0D 150hp Econetic
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 180hp
2.0D 180hp Econetic
2.0D 180hp AT
2.0D 180hp AWD AT
2.0D 210hp AT
1.8 110hp
1.8 125hp
1.8 130hp
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 115hp
2.0D 115hp AT
2.0D 90hp
2.0D 130hp
2.0D 130hp AT
2.2D
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
ST
AWD
FWD
SHO

Capacity

Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
569 L / 20.1 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.2 L / 5.5 qt
Passengers
5
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
255/45 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
12.1 m / 39.5 ft

Construction

Battery | Capacity
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1429 mm / 56.3 in
1542 mm / 60.7 in
Size | Length
4731 mm / 186.3 in
5154 mm / 202.9 in
Size | Width
1812 mm / 71.3 in
1935 mm / 76.2 in | 2177 mm / 85.7 in (mirror unfolded)
Track Width | Front
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
1659.0 mm / 65.3 in
Track Width | Rear
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1664.0 mm / 65.5 in
Wheel Size
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
16 in
19 in
Wheelbase
2850 mm / 112.2 in
2754 mm / 108.4 in
2868 mm / 112.9 in

Performance

Coefficient Of Drag
0.3

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine
Duratec 35 (Cyclone)
Engine | Bore
92.5 mm / 3.6 in
Engine | Displacement
3.5 L / 213.3 cu-in / 3496.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
86.7 mm / 3.4 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic 6F50

Production

Availability
2009 ~ 2012

Reviews

Neofiliac score
37%
16%
21%
Pros
  • Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
  • Good towing capacity
  • Rather spacious
  • Increased power output
  • Better interior appointments
  • More imposing exterior design
Cons
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • No powerful engine options
  • Stuck with basic suspension setup
  • Lack of refinement
  • Limited by its basic suspension setup
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Unreliable engines (internal water pump)

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.