Compare Ford Mondeo 2 vs Ford Taurus 4
Variants
1.8 110hp
1.8 125hp
1.8 130hp
2.0
2.0 AT
2.0D 115hp
2.0D 115hp AT
2.0D 90hp
2.0D 130hp
2.0D 130hp AT
2.2D
2.5
2.5 AT
3.0
ST
3.0 155hp
3.0 200hp
3.0 201hp
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
481 L / 17.0 cu-ft
Fuel Capacity
68.0 L / 18.0 gal
Passengers
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Power Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Hydraulic Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Tire Size
215/60 R16
Turning Circle
12.1 m / 39.7 ft
Construction
Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Size | Height
1429 mm / 56.3 in
1425 mm / 56.1 in
Size | Length
4731 mm / 186.3 in
5019 mm / 197.6 in
Size | Width
1812 mm / 71.3 in
1854 mm / 73.0 in
Track Width | Front
1522.0 mm / 59.9 in
Track Width | Rear
1537.0 mm / 60.5 in
1577.0 mm / 62.1 in
Wheel Size
16 in
16 in
Wheelbase
2754 mm / 108.4 in
2756 mm / 108.5 in
Performance
Coefficient Of Drag
0.3
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
89.0 mm / 3.5 in
Transmission | Gears
4-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
16%
13%
Pros
- Rather spacious
- Clean exterior styling
Cons
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with basic suspension setup
- Lack of refinement
- No powerful engine options
- Lethargic transmission
- Basic suspension setup
Remove
Remove
Related Products
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.