Compare BMW 5 Series G30 vs Kia Optima 4 vs Kia Rio 4 Sedan
Variants
520d
520d ED AT
520d Mild Hybrid
520d Mild Hybrid xDrive
520d AT
520d xDrive AT
520i AT
525d AT
530d AT
530d xDrive AT
530e PHEV
530e PHEV xDrive
530e iPerformance
530i AT
530i xDrive AT
540d xDrive AT
540i AT
540i xDrive AT
M550d
M550i 462hp
M550i 530hp
1.6 CRDi
1.6 CRDi DCT
1.6 T-GDI DCT
1.7 CRDi
1.7 CRDi DCT
2.0 CVVL
2.0 CVVL AT
2.0 Hybrid
2.0 PHEV
2.0 T-GDI AT
2.4 GDI AT
GT AT
1.6
1.6 AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
6.7 L / 7.1 qt
Engine Oil Capacity
4.1 L / 4.3 qt
Fuel Capacity
45.0 L / 11.9 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Semi-independent, coil spring, Elastic beam
Tire Size
185/65 R15
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.2 m / 33.5 ft
Construction
Battery | Type
Lithium-ion
Lithium-polymer
Battery | Voltage
351.0 V
360.0 V
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
135 mm / 5.3 in
140 mm / 5.5 in
Size | Height
1450 mm / 57.1 in
Size | Length
4384 mm / 172.6 in
Size | Width
1725 mm / 67.9 in
Track Width | Front
1524.0 mm / 60.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1529.0 mm / 60.2 in
Wheel Size
15 in
Wheelbase
2975 mm / 117.1 in
2581 mm / 101.6 in
Performance
Electric Range
54.0 km / 33.6 mi
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Compression Ratio
11.0:1
Engine | Displacement
1.6 L / 97.1 cu-in / 1591.0 cc
Engine | Power
130.0 hp / 96.9 kW @ 6300 rpm
Engine | Specific Output
81.7 hp/L / 1.3 hp/cu-in
Engine | Torque
161 Nm / 118.7 lb-ft @ 4850 rpm
Engine | Type
Naturally-aspirated direct-injected petrol inline-4 DOHC engine with 4 values per cylinder
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2017 ~ 2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
92%
51%
19%
Pros
- Double-wishbone + multi-link suspension setup
- Up to 530hp of power and 760Nm of torque
- Excellent 0.22 drag coefficient
- Addition of DCT
- Good 0.25 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.6L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Small turning circle
Cons
- Generic exterior and interior design
- Too many electronics
- No powerful engine options
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Miserably low engine output
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.