Compare Chevrolet Cruze Sedan vs Chevrolet Sonic

Variants
1.6 113hp
1.6 113hp AT
1.6 124hp
1.7D
1.8 AT
1.8 AU/EU
1.8 NA
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 163hp
2.0D 163hp AT
1.2 70PS
1.2 86PS
1.3D 75PS
1.3D 95PS
1.4 100PS
1.4 100PS AT
1.6
1.6 AT

Capacity

Fuel Capacity
60.0 L / 15.9 gal
46.0 L / 12.2 gal
Passengers
5
5

Chassis

Brakes | Front
Disc
Brakes | Rear
Drum
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
MacPherson
MacPherson
Suspension | Rear
Torsion
Torsion
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
10.1 m / 33.0 ft

Construction

Body Style
4-door Sedan
4-door Sedan

Dimensions

Size | Height
1477 mm / 58.1 in
1517 mm / 59.7 in
Size | Length
4399 mm / 173.2 in
Size | Width
1788 mm / 70.4 in
1735 mm / 68.3 in
Track Width | Front
1544.0 mm / 60.8 in
Track Width | Rear
1558.0 mm / 61.3 in
Wheelbase
2685 mm / 105.7 in
2525 mm / 99.4 in

Powertrain

Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Emission Standard
Euro 5
Euro 5

Reviews

Neofiliac score
18%
20%
Pros
  • Good fuel economy
  • Cheap to purchase
  • Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
  • Small turning circle
Cons
  • Uninspiring handling
  • Bad 0-100kph time
  • No powerful engine options
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
  • Questionable design
  • Horrible 0-100kph time
  • Can't even reach 200km/h
  • Miserably low engine output
  • Only available with small engines
  • Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front

Price

Offers (incl. referral links)
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.