Compare Volvo S90 vs Volvo S60 III vs Hyundai Sonata 7 LF
Variants
D3 Euro6
D3 Euro6d
D3 Euro6 AT
D3 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6
D4 Euro6d AT
D4 Euro6 AT
D4 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6 AWD AT
D5 Euro6d AWD AT
T4 Euro6 AT
T4 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2018
T5 Euro6d AT
T5 Euro6 AT 2017
T5 254PS AT
T6 Euro6d AWD AT
T6 Euro6 AWD
T6 Euro6 AWD AT
T8 AWD Hybrid
T8 AWD PHEV
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.6 T-GDi Eco
2.0 GDi Hybrid
2.0 GDi PHEV
2.0 T-GDi
2.4 GDi
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
500 L / 17.7 cu-ft
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Offroad | Approach Angle
19.0 deg
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1431 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4855 mm / 191.1 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1865 mm / 73.4 in
Track Width | Front
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheel Size
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2805 mm / 110.4 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
70%
61%
34%
Pros
- Elegant exterior design
- Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
- Superb offroad capabilities
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 1.9L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Much more mature styling
- No longer underpowered
Cons
- Only available with small engines
- Only available with small engines
- Lack smoothness
- Unreliable engines
- Too many electronic gimmicks
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.