Compare Volvo S60 II facelift vs Volvo S90 facelift vs Honda Accord 9
Variants
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
B4
B5
B6
D3 MT
D3
D4
D5
T8
2.0 PHEV
2.4
2.4 CVT
3.5
3.5 AT
Capacity
Cargo Capacity
461 L / 16.3 cu-ft
Engine Oil Capacity
5.6 L / 5.9 qt
Fuel Capacity
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Disc, 322 mm
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc, 320 mm
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
11.8 m / 38.7 ft
Water Fording
250 mm / 9.8 in
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
156 mm / 6.1 in
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1446 mm / 56.9 in
1466 mm / 57.7 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
4969 mm / 195.6 in
Size | Width
1879 mm / 74.0 in | 2019 mm / 79.5 in (mirror unfolded) | 1895 mm / 74.6 in (mirror folded)
1849 mm / 72.8 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1617.0 mm / 63.7 in
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1618.0 mm / 63.7 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in, 21 in
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2941 mm / 115.8 in
2776 mm / 109.3 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.26 ~ 0.29
0.30
Electric Range
51.0 km / 31.7 mi
Top Speed
180.0 km/h / 111.8 mph
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Production
Availability
2020
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
64%
25%
Pros
- Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
- Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Overall good styling
- Good 0.26 drag coefficient
- Low fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Superb exterior styling
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Electronically limited to just 180 km/h
- Only available with small engines
- Unreliable
- Downgrade of suspension setup
- Wide use of CVTs
- No longer built with enthusiasts in mind
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.