Compare Volvo S60 II facelift vs Volvo S60 III vs Hyundai Sonata 7 LF
Variants
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
B3
B4
B5
B5 AWD
B6 AWD
T4
T5
T5 AWD
T6 AWD
T6 Twin Engine AWD
T8 Twin Engine AWD
Polestar
1.6 T-GDi Eco
2.0 GDi Hybrid
2.0 GDi PHEV
2.0 T-GDi
2.4 GDi
Capacity
Fuel Capacity
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Payload
554 kg / 1221 lbs
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
Double-wishbone
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Double-wishbone
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
Turning Circle
10.9 m / 35.8 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
11.6 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
142 mm / 5.6 in
135 mm / 5.3 in
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
1431 mm / 56.3 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
4761 mm / 187.4 in
4855 mm / 191.1 in
Size | Width
1850 mm / 72.8 in | 2040 mm / 80.3 in (mirror unfolded) | 1916 mm / 75.4 in (mirror folded)
1865 mm / 73.4 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1593.0 mm / 62.7 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
17 in, 18 in, 19 in, 20 in
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2872 mm / 113.1 in
2805 mm / 110.4 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
35.0 m / 114.8 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
0.27
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Engine | Bore
82.0 mm / 3.2 in
Engine | Displacement
2.0 L / 120.2 cu-in / 1969.0 cc
Engine | Stroke
93.2 mm / 3.7 in
Transmission | Gears
8-speed
6-speed
Transmission | Type
Automatic
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
61%
34%
Pros
- Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
- Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Decent styling
- Good 0.27 drag coefficient
- Good interior quality
- Excellent 0.24 drag coefficient
- Much more mature styling
- No longer underpowered
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- Only available with small engines
- Lack smoothness
- Unreliable engines
- Too many electronic gimmicks
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.