Compare Volvo S60 II facelift vs Volkswagen Jetta A6 vs Ford Mondeo 4
Variants
D2 115PS
D2 115PS AT
D2 120PS
D2 120PS AT
D3 136PS
D3 136PS AT
D3 150PS
D3 150PS AT
D4 163PS
D4 163PS AT
D4 181PS
D4 181PS AT
D4 190PS
D4 190PS AT
D4 190PS AWD AT
D5 215PS
D5 215PS AT
D5 215PS AWD AT
D5 225PS AT
Polestar 350PS
Polestar 367PS
T2 AT
T3
T3 152PS
T3 AT
T3 AT
T4 180PS
T4 180PS AT
T4 190PS
T4 190PS AT
T4F
T4F AT
T5 245PS AT
T6 304PS AWD AT
T6 306PS AT
T6 306PS AWD AT
1.2 TSI 105hp
1.2 TSI 105hp BlueMotion
1.4 TSI 122hp
1.4 TSI 122hp DSG
1.4 TSI 160hp
1.4 TSI 160hp DSG
1.4 TSI Hybrid 170hp DSG
1.6
1.6 DSG
1.6 TDI
1.6 TDI DSG
2.0 TDI
2.0 TDI DSG
2.0 TSI 200hp
2.0 TSI 200hp DSG
2.0 TSI 210hp
2.0 TSI 210hp DSG
1.0T
1.5T
1.5T AT
1.5D
1.5D Econetic
1.6D
1.6D Econetic
2.0T 203hp AT
2.0T 240hp AT
Hybrid
2.0D 150hp
2.0D 150hp AWD
2.0D 150hp Econetic
2.0D 150hp AT
2.0D 180hp
2.0D 180hp Econetic
2.0D 180hp AT
2.0D 180hp AWD AT
2.0D 210hp AT
Capacity
Coolant Capacity
8.0 L / 8.5 qt
Fuel Capacity
67.5 L / 17.8 gal
Passengers
5
5
5
Chassis
Brakes | Front
Ventilated discs
Ventilated discs
Brakes | Rear
Disc
Disc
Power Steering
Electric Steering
Electric Steering
Suspension | Front
Independent, Spring MacPherson, with stabilizer
MacPherson strut
MacPherson strut
Suspension | Rear
Multi-link
Multi-link
Tire Size
245/35 ZR20
215/60 R16, 235/50 R17, 235/45 R18, 235/40 R19
Turning Circle
11.6 m / 38.0 ft
Construction
Battery | Capacity
1.1 kWh (gross)
1.4 kWh (gross)
Body Style
4-door Sedan
Dimensions
Ground Clearance
128 mm / 5.0 in
Size | Height
1484 mm / 58.4 in
Size | Length
4635 mm / 182.5 in
Track Width | Front
1588.0 mm / 62.5 in
1599.0 mm / 63.0 in
Track Width | Rear
1585.0 mm / 62.4 in
1595.0 mm / 62.8 in
Wheel Size
8Jx20
6.5J x 16, 7.5J x 17, 8J x 18, 8J x 19
Wheelbase
2776 mm / 109.3 in
2850 mm / 112.2 in
Performance
Braking | 100 km/h - 0
37.0 m / 121.4 ft
Coefficient Of Drag
0.28
Powertrain
Drivetrain Layout
Front-engine (transverse), Front-wheel drive
Transmission | Gears
6-speed
Reviews
Neofiliac score
61%
44%
37%
Pros
- Interesting range of I5 and I6 engines
- Down to 4.7s 0-100kph time
- Good 0.28 drag coefficient
- Down to very low 3.7L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
- Good towing capacity
- Down to very low 3.6L/100km fuel consumption
- Good towing capacity
Cons
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
- No powerful engine options
- Only available with small engines
- Stuck with MacPherson struts in the front
Remove
Remove
Remove
Add up to 4 products to the comparison using the search bar above
Information on this page is provided on an as-is basis. No warranty on accuracy is implied. This page may contain affiliate links to third-party merchants such as Amazon and eBay. If you make a purchase using the supplied link, we may receive a commission. Neofiliac places the utmost respect for your privacy. We use no cookie whatsoever beyond that needed for the proper functioning of the website.